Equity Culture

Tel: +44 (0)7956 691 104

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Board Evaluations
  • Regulatory Compliance
  • Clients and Case-Studies
  • Noticeboard
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Changes to Articles in the forthcoming AGM round

18th January 2011 9 Comments

“We are trying to find out if anybody with a 31 December year end is proposing to amend their articles. Most companies like us should now have CA 2006 compliant articles. One area which might be looked at is the ability of the board to change the name of the company. PIRC do not like this and want the special resolution regime re-introduced.

Any thoughts?”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Only your comment and indication of company type will be published

Comments

  1. FTSE 250 said

    18th January 2011 at 12:01 am

    We changed our articles in June 2010 and have been advised that there is no absolute requirement to change them at the next AGM in May

    • FTSE 100 said

      18th January 2011 at 12:01 am

      We amended our articles in 2010 to be compliant with the Companies Act 2006, however, we are amending them again this year to allow for the annual re-election of directors and to tidy up other provisions around the election, retirement and removal of directors.

      We probably would not have amended them for the annual re-election point if we had not wanted to change the election and removal provisions.

      • FTSE 100 said

        18th January 2011 at 12:01 am

        We updated our articles last year so don’t have any changes this year.

        We got push back from PIRC on this area but not from anyone else.

        • FTSE SMALL CAP said

          18th January 2011 at 12:00 am

          We have a 31 December year end and adopted CA 2006 compliant Articles at our 2010 AGM. We made no specific change in relation to the ability of the board to change the company name. All voting organisations, including PIRC, voted for the changes, and no-one asked about the name change issue.

          • FTSE 250 said

            18th January 2011 at 12:00 am

            We amended our Articles at our 2010 AGM in line with CA 2006 which included authority to change the company’s name. After some dialogue with PIRC to reassure them that we had no intention of changing our name and we were in fact cementing the company’s brand they issued a “For” recommendation for the resolution.

            • FTSE SMALL CAP said

              18th January 2011 at 12:00 am

              We have adopted new compliant articles, including the ability for the directors’ to pass a resolution to change the name of the Company.

              Similar to the above PIRC advice in their governance report was “abstain” against the resolution to adopt new articles, purely due to a change of name being in the power of the directors.

              They cited that a name change could, for a variety of reasons, have significant implications for a company’s value. We had a brief dialogue and agreed to disagree. The resolution was passed with 95+% of the vote. PIRC don’t seem to be that influential with our shareholders!

              • FTSE SMALL CAP said

                18th January 2011 at 12:00 am

                No plans change our articles at the 2011 AGM. We put all the final changes through last year to be CA2006 compliant, including the ability for the directors’ to pass a resolution to change the name of the Company.

                PIRC advice in their governance report was “abstain” against the resolution to adopt new articles, purely due to a change of name being in the power of the directors. Reasons cited included that a name change could have significant implications for a company’s value where the name is an important aspect of its brand; substantial costs involved associated with the change of name process, advertising and communications with stakeholders. We entered into dialogue and said directors previously would have taken all these things into account before putting a special resolution to shareholders – it is not something done lightly or on a whim. PIRC would not change from abstain. The resolution was passed just under 98% of the vote and very little abstain. So it depends how influential PIRC are with your shareholders.

                No plans to reverse this

                • FTSE 250 said

                  18th January 2011 at 12:00 am

                  We put this change through last year as part of our “final” mop up of the 2006 Act changes and do not intend to reverse it.

                  We are putting the entire Board up for re-election this time but have decided to retain the 3 year rotation provisions in the Articles. Accordingly we do not anticipate making any changes to our articles this year.

                  • FTSE 250 said

                    18th January 2011 at 12:00 am

                    Provide you are CA 2006 compliant the only issues to consider would be whether you are proposing to do annual re-election of directors in which case you may need to amend the wording.

                    Sections

                    • Home
                    • About Us
                    • Board Evaluations
                    • Regulatory Compliance
                    • Clients and Case-Studies
                    • Noticeboard
                    • Blog
                    • Contact Us

                    Recent Notices

                    • How often does your Board meet?

                      How often does your Board meet?

                      29th April 2025
                    • Know Your Customer & Ultimate Beneficial Owner requests

                      Know Your Customer & Ultimate Beneficial Owner requests

                      28th March 2025
                    • The Market Abuse Regulations (MAR) & Insider Dealing training

                      The Market Abuse Regulations (MAR) & Insider Dealing training

                      28th March 2025
                    • Reviewing and updating our Board skills matrix

                      Reviewing and updating our Board skills matrix

                      24th February 2025
                    • Do any companies pay to access their Glass Lewis report?

                      Do any companies pay to access their Glass Lewis report?

                      11th February 2025

                    Contact EquityCulture

                    Address:

                    89 Kesteven Way,
                    Corby,
                    Northamptonshire
                    NN18 8GF

                    Registered in England and Wales No. 06008649.

                    • Blog
                    • UK Board Evaluations
                    • UK Corporate Governance

                    © 2025 EquityCulture | Site Designed & Built by Midland Tech